NQ Quickie
Trades Own Strategy
- hypothetical · Annual Return (Compounded)
- 27.6%
- Max Drawdown
- 74.3%
- Trades
- 403
- Win Trades
- 35.0%
- Profit Factor
- 1.20
- Win Months
- 60.0%
About this strategy
Short term trades on NQ futures - System attempts to ride the short term momentum. Tight stops employed and winners are let run until momentum exhaustion. Model account trades 2 NQ contracts, but you could follow it with 1 contract if you wish to, with a minimum capital requirement of USD 25 k. You must be psychologically prepared to see a lot of small losses and play the waiting game for the big winners. ( i.e. expect lower win-ratio, but higher profit factor ).
The beauty of the system is that the exposure time to market is very low (approximately 10% of cash market hours). It has an above average calamar ratio historically, which justifies the higher leverage employed. For the conservative ones, even a leverage of only 2x can be employed
No of trades expected : around 70 per year
System was rescaled to 50% on 26/05/2021 and hence you will see historic trades with 1 contract. Going forward, trades will be with 2 NQ contract per order.
The beauty of the system is that the exposure time to market is very low (approximately 10% of cash market hours). It has an above average calamar ratio historically, which justifies the higher leverage employed. For the conservative ones, even a leverage of only 2x can be employed
No of trades expected : around 70 per year
System was rescaled to 50% on 26/05/2021 and hence you will see historic trades with 1 contract. Going forward, trades will be with 2 NQ contract per order.
Hypothetical Monthly Returns (includes fees/commissions)
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 35.7 | 11.1 | 17.2 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 17.1 | -3.9 | 4.6 | -12.2 | 46.4 | 215.8 |
| 2022 | -2.7 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 18.3 | -2.6 | -12.8 | -13.5 | 21.5 | 13.0 | 30.7 |
| 2023 | -4.1 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 23.4 | -4.7 | -7.7 | 14.9 | -0.0 | -7.6 | -9.5 | 10.9 | 22.2 |
| 2024 | -5.0 | 8.8 | 21.1 | 0.3 | 4.6 | 17.8 | -0.5 | -12.1 | -3.6 | -8.7 | 4.5 | 6.9 | 33.1 |
| 2025 | 3.3 | 0.6 | -2.9 | 11.4 | -3.6 | -4.8 | -9.2 | 3.1 | -11.4 | 11.8 | -11.4 | -20.0 | -32.3 |
| 2026 | -35.3 | -19.0 | -4.8 | 18.1 | 33.7 | 0.6 | -3.1 | 9.7 | 1.8 | -14.2 |
Statistics
Overview
| Strategy began | 12/7/2020 |
|---|---|
| Suggested Minimum Capital | $40,000 |
| Age | 70 months |
| C2 Rank | 320 |
| What it trades | Futures |
| # Trades | 403 |
| # Profitable | 141 |
| % Profitable | 35.0% |
| Avg trade duration | 12.7 hours |
| Max peak-to-valley drawdown | 74.3% |
| drawdown period | June 17, 2024 - April 17, 2026 |
| Annual Return (Compounded) | 27.6% |
| Avg win | $2,369 |
| Avg loss | $1,086 |
Ratios
| W:L ratio | 1.17 |
|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.69 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.59 |
CORRELATION STATISTICS
| Correlation to SP500 | 0.26 |
|---|---|
| Return Percent SP500 (cumu) during strategy life | 107.8% |
| Return of Strat Pcnt - Return of SP500 Pcnt (cumu) | 199.3% |
Return Statistics
| Ann Return (w trading costs) | 27.6% |
|---|---|
| Return Pcnt (Compound or Annual, age-based, NFA compliant) | 0.3% |
| Return Pcnt Since TOS Status | -28.3% |
| Ann Return (Compnd, No Fees) | 35.3% |
Slump
| Current Slump as Pcnt Equity | 105.4% |
|---|---|
| Current Slump, time of slump as pcnt of strategy life | 0.4% |
Instruments
| Percent Trades Forex | 0.0% |
|---|---|
| Percent Trades Futures | 1.0% |
| Percent Trades Options | 0.0% |
| Short Options - Percent Covered | 100.0% |
| Percent Trades Stocks | 0.0% |
Risk of Ruin (Monte-Carlo)
| Chance of 10% account loss | 46.5% |
|---|---|
| Chance of 20% account loss | 26.5% |
| Chance of 30% account loss | 9.5% |
| Chance of 40% account loss | 2.0% |
| Chance of 50% account loss | 0.5% |
| Chance of 60% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
| Chance of 70% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
| Chance of 80% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
| Chance of 90% account loss (Monte Carlo) | 0.0% |
Automation
| Percentage Signals Automated | 94.0% |
|---|
Popularity
| Popularity (Today) | 581 |
|---|---|
| Popularity (Last 6 weeks) | 841 |
| C2 Score | 320 |
| Popularity (7 days, Percentile 1000 scale) | 634 |
Trading Style
| Any stock shorts? 0/1 | 0 |
|---|
Trades-Own-System Certification
| Trades Own System? | 187070 |
|---|---|
| TOS percent | 5.0% |
Win / Loss
| Avg Loss | $1,086 |
|---|---|
| Avg Win | $2,368 |
| # Winners | 141 |
| Sum Trade PL (losers) | $284,598 |
| Sum Trade PL (winners) | $333,958 |
| Num Months Winners | 42 |
| # Losers | 262 |
| % Winners | 35.0% |
Dividends
| Dividends Received in Model Acct | 0 |
|---|
Age
| Num Months filled monthly returns table | 70 |
|---|
Frequency
| Avg Position Time (mins) | 762.30 |
|---|---|
| Avg Position Time (hrs) | 12.70 |
| Avg Trade Length | 0.50 |
| Last Trade Ago | 6 |
Leverage
| Daily leverage (average) | 7.87 |
|---|---|
| Daily leverage (max) | 19 |
Regression
| Alpha | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Beta | 0.54 |
| Treynor Index | 0.14 |
Maximum Adverse Excursion (MAE)
| MAE:Equity, average, all trades | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| MAE:Equity, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | 0.05 |
| MAE:Equity, average, losing trades | 0.03 |
| MAE:Equity, losing trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| MAE:Equity, average, winning trades | 0.01 |
| MAE:Equity, win trades only, 95th Percentile Value for this strat | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - All trades | 21.45 |
| MAE:PL (avg, all trades) | -0.67 |
| MAE:PL (avg, losing trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - Losing Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 49.37 |
| MAE:PL - Winning Trades - this strat Percentile of All Strats | 69.63 |
| MAE:PL (avg, winning trades) | — |
| MAE:PL - worst single value for strategy | — |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Winning trades | 0.24 |
| Avg(MAE) / Avg(PL) - Losing trades | -1.28 |
| Hold-and-Hope Ratio | 0.05 |
RATIO STATISTICS
| Mean | 0.36 |
|---|---|
| SD | 0.40 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0.88 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0.87 |
| df | 67 |
| t | 2.10 |
| p | 0.02 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.04 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.72 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.04 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.71 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.85 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 3.64 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.70 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.35 |
| Upside SD | 0.37 |
| Downside SD | 0.19 |
| N nonnegative terms | 33 |
| N negative terms | 35 |
| N of observations | 68 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.12 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.36 |
| SD of predictor | 0.17 |
| SD of criterion | 0.40 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.20 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.48 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.30 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.16 |
| DF error | 66 |
| t(b) | 1.63 |
| p(b) | 0.05 |
| t(a) | 1.76 |
| p(a) | 0.04 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.11 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 1.06 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.04 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.64 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.75 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.30 |
| Mean | 0.28 |
| SD | 0.38 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0.72 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0.71 |
| df | 67 |
| t | 1.71 |
| p | 0.05 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | -0.12 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.55 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | -0.12 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.54 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.32 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 3.05 |
| Upside part of mean | 0.64 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.37 |
| Upside SD | 0.33 |
| Downside SD | 0.21 |
| N nonnegative terms | 33 |
| N negative terms | 35 |
| N of observations | 68 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.10 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.28 |
| SD of predictor | 0.17 |
| SD of criterion | 0.38 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.19 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.45 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.23 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.14 |
| DF error | 66 |
| t(b) | 1.60 |
| p(b) | 0.06 |
| t(a) | 1.42 |
| p(a) | 0.08 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | -0.11 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 1.01 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.09 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.56 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.62 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.23 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.15 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.19 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.07 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.13 |
| Mean | 0.32 |
| SD | 0.30 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 1.08 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 1.07 |
| df | 1493 |
| t | 2.57 |
| p | 0.46 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.25 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.90 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.25 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.90 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.04 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 8.81 |
| Upside part of mean | 1.38 |
| Downside part of mean | -1.06 |
| Upside SD | 0.25 |
| Downside SD | 0.16 |
| N nonnegative terms | 321 |
| N negative terms | 1173 |
| N of observations | 1494 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.11 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.32 |
| SD of predictor | 0.17 |
| SD of criterion | 0.30 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.28 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.50 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.26 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.08 |
| DF error | 1492 |
| t(b) | 11.17 |
| p(b) | 0.36 |
| t(a) | 2.19 |
| p(a) | 0.47 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.41 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.59 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.03 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.50 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.64 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.26 |
| Mean | 0.28 |
| SD | 0.29 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 0.95 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 0.95 |
| df | 1493 |
| t | 2.26 |
| p | 0.46 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.13 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 1.77 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.13 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 1.77 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.74 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 8.46 |
| Upside part of mean | 1.35 |
| Downside part of mean | -1.07 |
| Upside SD | 0.25 |
| Downside SD | 0.16 |
| N nonnegative terms | 321 |
| N negative terms | 1173 |
| N of observations | 1494 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.10 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.28 |
| SD of predictor | 0.17 |
| SD of criterion | 0.29 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.27 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.48 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.23 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.08 |
| DF error | 1492 |
| t(b) | 10.88 |
| p(b) | 0.36 |
| t(a) | 1.94 |
| p(a) | 0.47 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.39 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.57 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.00 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 0.46 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 0.58 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.23 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.03 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.04 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.02 |
| Mean | 0.76 |
| SD | 0.26 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 2.97 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 2.95 |
| df | 130 |
| t | 2.10 |
| p | 0.41 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.16 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 5.76 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.15 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 5.74 |
| Sortino ratio | 5.72 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 11.27 |
| Upside part of mean | 1.50 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.74 |
| Upside SD | 0.22 |
| Downside SD | 0.13 |
| N nonnegative terms | 34 |
| N negative terms | 97 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.23 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.76 |
| SD of predictor | 0.14 |
| SD of criterion | 0.26 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.24 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.44 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.66 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.06 |
| DF error | 129 |
| t(b) | 2.76 |
| p(b) | 0.35 |
| t(a) | 1.86 |
| p(a) | 0.40 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.12 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.75 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.04 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 1.36 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 1.73 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.66 |
| Mean | 0.73 |
| SD | 0.25 |
| Sharpe ratio (Glass type estimate) | 2.86 |
| Sharpe ratio (Hedges UMVUE) | 2.84 |
| df | 130 |
| t | 2.02 |
| p | 0.41 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 0.06 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for Sharpe Ratio | 5.65 |
| Lowerbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 0.05 |
| Upperbound of 95% CI (Gibbons, Hedeker & Davis approximation | 5.64 |
| Sortino ratio | 5.38 |
| Upside Potential Ratio | 10.89 |
| Upside part of mean | 1.47 |
| Downside part of mean | -0.75 |
| Upside SD | 0.22 |
| Downside SD | 0.14 |
| N nonnegative terms | 34 |
| N negative terms | 97 |
| N of observations | 131 |
| Mean of predictor | 0.22 |
| Mean of criterion | 0.73 |
| SD of predictor | 0.14 |
| SD of criterion | 0.25 |
| Covariance | 0.01 |
| r | 0.23 |
| b (slope, estimate of beta) | 0.43 |
| a (intercept, estimate of alpha) | 0.63 |
| Mean Square Error | 0.06 |
| DF error | 129 |
| t(b) | 2.73 |
| p(b) | 0.35 |
| t(a) | 1.79 |
| p(a) | 0.40 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.12 |
| VAR (95 Confidence Intrvl) | 0.03 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for beta | 0.74 |
| Lowerbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | -0.07 |
| Upperbound of 95% confidence interval for alpha | 1.33 |
| Treynor index (mean / b) | 1.68 |
| Jensen alpha (a) | 0.63 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.02 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.03 |
| VaR(95%) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall on VaR | 0.02 |
ORDER STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 68 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.73 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.96 |
| Median | 1.00 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.10 |
| Maximum | 1.37 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.91 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.98 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1.04 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.19 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.14 |
| Number outliers low | 1 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.01 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.73 |
| Number of outliers high | 2 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.03 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.35 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | -0.39 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.09 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.11 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | -0.19 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.11 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.14 |
| Number of observations | 1494 |
| Minimum | 0.94 |
| Quartile 1 | 1.00 |
| Median | 1 |
| Quartile 3 | 1 |
| Maximum | 1.15 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.98 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1.00 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.02 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.00 |
| Number outliers low | 221 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.15 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.98 |
| Number of outliers high | 267 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.18 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.03 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0.10 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.02 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.07 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.02 |
| Number of observations | 131 |
| Minimum | 0.95 |
| Quartile 1 | 1 |
| Median | 1 |
| Quartile 3 | 1.00 |
| Maximum | 1.06 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.99 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 1 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 1.00 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 1.02 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.00 |
| Number outliers low | 26 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0.20 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0.99 |
| Number of outliers high | 29 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.22 |
| Mean of outliers high | 1.03 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.25 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.01 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.02 |
DRAW DOWN STATISTICS
| Number of observations | 12 |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 0.01 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.02 |
| Median | 0.05 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.16 |
| Maximum | 0.57 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.02 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.03 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0.10 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.34 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.14 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 1 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.08 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0.57 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | -0.59 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.36 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.43 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.98 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.56 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 22.34 |
| Number of observations | 50 |
| Minimum | 0.00 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.01 |
| Median | 0.03 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.06 |
| Maximum | 0.60 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.01 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.02 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0.04 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.17 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.05 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 6 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0.12 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0.27 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0.53 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0.18 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0.43 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0.60 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0.18 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0.46 |
| Number of observations | 4 |
| Minimum | 0.01 |
| Quartile 1 | 0.04 |
| Median | 0.06 |
| Quartile 3 | 0.10 |
| Maximum | 0.17 |
| Mean of quarter 1 | 0.01 |
| Mean of quarter 2 | 0.05 |
| Mean of quarter 3 | 0.07 |
| Mean of quarter 4 | 0.17 |
| Inter Quartile Range | 0.06 |
| Number outliers low | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers low | 0 |
| Mean of outliers low | 0 |
| Number of outliers high | 0 |
| Percentage of outliers high | 0 |
| Mean of outliers high | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (moments method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (moments method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (moments method) | 0 |
| Extreme Value Index (regression method) | 0 |
| VaR(95%) (regression method) | 0 |
| Expected Shortfall (regression method) | 0 |
| Strat Max DD how much worse than SP500 max DD during strat life? | -399988960 |
| Max Equity Drawdown (num days) | 669 |
| Last 4 Months - Pcnt Negative | 0.2% |
COMBINED STATISTICS
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | 0.82 |
|---|---|
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | 0.36 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | 0.62 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | 1.06 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | 1.92 |
| j156mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j157mfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | 0.82 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | 0.36 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | 0.60 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | 2.14 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | 10.03 |
| j313dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| j314dfCOMBRisPar | 0 |
| Annualized return (arithmetic extrapolation) | 0.92 |
| Compounded annual return (geometric extrapolation) | 1.13 |
| Calmar ratio (compounded annual return / max draw down) | 6.62 |
| Compounded annual return / average of 25% largest draw downs | 6.62 |
| Compounded annual return / Expected Shortfall lognormal | 38.65 |
Trading record
Placed 894 trades in real-life brokerage accounts.
| Symbol | Side | Qty | Opened | Closed | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Sep 3, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 | $1,056 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 27, 2026 | Aug 27, 2026 | ($648) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 25, 2026 | Aug 25, 2026 | ($963) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 13, 2026 | Aug 13, 2026 | ($300) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 12, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 | ($1,047) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 4, 2026 | Aug 4, 2026 | $5,211 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 3, 2026 | $1,737 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jul 21, 2026 | Jul 21, 2026 | $1,851 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jul 20, 2026 | Jul 20, 2026 | ($1,587) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jul 14, 2026 | Jul 14, 2026 | ($1,203) |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | $2,388 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jun 29, 2026 | Jun 29, 2026 | $2,874 |
| MNQ U6 | long | 6 | Jun 18, 2026 | Jun 18, 2026 | $2,103 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 15, 2026 | Jun 15, 2026 | $2,235 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 12, 2026 | Jun 12, 2026 | ($982) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 11, 2026 | Jun 11, 2026 | ($3,786) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 9, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 | ($2,685) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 8, 2026 | Jun 8, 2026 | ($1,122) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Jun 1, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 | ($505) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 28, 2026 | May 28, 2026 | $313 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 22, 2026 | May 22, 2026 | ($1,478) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 20, 2026 | May 20, 2026 | $2,251 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 14, 2026 | May 14, 2026 | $204 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 13, 2026 | May 13, 2026 | $1,341 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 8, 2026 | May 8, 2026 | $4,665 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 7, 2026 | May 7, 2026 | ($1,392) |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 6, 2026 | May 6, 2026 | $2,641 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 5, 2026 | May 5, 2026 | $1,167 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | May 1, 2026 | May 1, 2026 | $459 |
| MNQ M6 | long | 6 | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 | $171 |
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading. Also, because these trades have not actually been executed, these results may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to these being shown.